I’m pointing to an old one because the causes are well known, there isn’t any current propaganda campaign to confuse people about it, and its a wide-area unanticipated failure.
That kind of facility tends to have its own backup power, often with a week or so of fuel stockpiled on-site.
Back when Hurricane Katrina hit New Orleans, there was a period where the only building with power was a datacenter. The lights prompted soldiers to break in, and the system admin wound up having to pretend that they’d discovered evidence of somebody nefarious forcing the door, so they’d clear the building and leave.
I think that one is coming from the UK Daily Mail which is generally unreliable.
During one of these events, it’s really common for all kinds of misinformation and rumors to fly, and even to come from otherwise trustworthy people.
I’ll note that the US had some very large-scale blackouts in the 1960s which were caused by fairly ordinary technical problems.
In the US, the towers that provide mobile service are required to have a few hours worth of battery backup. The EU may require more, but I’d expect them to go down not too long after the main grid goes out.
It’s a gift link. Folks with Javascript enabled just get the article without needing that.
A big chunk of the US population wants dictatorship
Definitely not 100% external. A chunk of cases are known to be genetic.
And these people were eating a mushroom known to be mildly poisonous.
Exactly. There’s a reason I won’t eat any Amanita: the similarity of edible and deadly species in that genus makes them the main source of mushroom fatalities in North America.
By contrast, messing up a bolete ID is likely to result in a meal that is too bitter to eat. That’s a much more acceptable risk.
And these days, that means making sure it’s a book written by someone who knows what they are doing, rather than AI auto-generated bullshit.
If you know what you’re doing, you get incredible deliciousness.
And to be clear, “death” isn’t much of an exaggeration:
I responded to it:
We want to run prescribed burns when it’s wet, and suppress the high-intensity fires that destroy everything. Both actions require trained fire crews.
We want to run prescribed burns when it’s wet, and suppress the high-intensity fires that destroy everything. Both actions require trained fire crews.
Yeah, they’re firing everybody who was hired in the last two years, no matter what they work on. That includes people who do stuff like nuclear weapons stockpile stewardship — Musk denied a national security exemption for them.
My impression is that it was highly regional, with a few areas, covering several percent of the population, being really big on it for several years.
Link to article with source in a comment due to Washington Post links getting dropped a lot in inter-server messaging when attached to posts
It looks like a planned gradual turnup