TigrisMorte

Their theory is that they can replace Human employees with this and thus save money.

I tore your entire bullshit position to shreds, so you whined a lot about unrelated crap in an effort to distract from your having no leg to stand on.

Library, look it up. And the publishers always hated Libraries.

Only one remaining! Order soon!

“That’s a joke, I say that’s a joke son” - Foghorn Leghorn

(in case it really did whiz on by; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dick_Tracy_(character) https://i.pcmag.com/imagery/encyclopedia-terms/dick-tracy-watch-_dtwatch.fit_lim.size_640x.jpg

Lots more elections than every four! Every Election, no excuses!

Bellow I’ve filtered out the primaries, which often have issues not related to party as well, and excludes local elections.

link at end:
“2023 – November (Constitutional)
Registered Voters
17,759,273
Voting Age Population (VAP)
21,925,627
Percentage of VAP Registered
81.00%
Turnout
2,563,469
Percent of Turnout to Registered
14.43%
Percent of Turnout to VAP
11.69%
2022 – November (Gubernatorial)
Registered Voters
17,672,143
Voting Age Population (VAP)
21,866,700
Percentage of VAP Registered
80.82%
Turnout
8,102,908
Percent of Turnout to Registered
45.85%
Percent of Turnout to VAP
37.06%
2021 - November (Constitutional)
Registered Voters
16,968,756
Voting Age Population (VAP)
21,866,700
Percentage of VAP Registered
77.60%
Turnout
1,485,066
Percent of Turnout to Registered
8.75%
Percent of Turnout to VAP
6.79%
2020 – November (Presidential)
Registered Voters
16,955,519
Voting Age Population (VAP)
21,596,071
Percentage of VAP Registered
78.51%
Turnout
11,315,056
Percent of Turnout to Registered
66.73%
Percent of Turnout to VAP
52.39” - https://www.sos.state.tx.us/elections/historical/70-92.shtml

those whom you call “political class”, are in fact the representatives of the very wealthy, are only there as lots of Eligible Voters sat out prior elections, and the “political class”'s owners paid for the propaganda that convinced them to do so. Exact same bullshit they’ve sold to you in fact.

Your calling files, book documents to be specific, books, doesn’t change that IA is storing files, ebooks to be specific, nor that the ruling shall affect all Libraries, which includes the Internet Archive to be specific. And the actual issue, is that the publishers refuse to offer ebooks to Libraries as they assume it’ll cost sales when in fact the folks using the Library are there as they are not going to go buy one.

You are simply wrong from the get go. This is the only way it’ll ever get addressed, is 100% in the stated purpose of the Internet Archive, the dumb part isn’t on the side of preservation efforts, there isn’t a separate issue nor is there a separate copyright the publishers are the same with the exact same unsustainable arguments regardless of web page, code, or ebook.
You are making the same mistake made upon a lot of patents, assuming “but on a computer” is somehow transformative.

Guess he’ll never know then. What are they supposed to be a detective or something?

100% the fault of anyone that does not Vote.

Which is why the right work so hard to assure Gov. does not work.

And just like that you’ve seen one. Now contact the prior dude on his trist welevision and let them know.

sort by new

Not after they eat one of googlie’s AI recipes they don’t, not anymore.

They all hope it’ll end years of having to pay employees.

As well as no clue how not to make every product they have shit over time.

It is Xitter where Xcrete posts. And always shall it remain.

The post was in response to someone asking, “Do you have those stats?”
My post referenced probability multiple times.
That is the last of the clues I’m going to give. Perhaps try reading it again and looking up the words you are unsure of. Then instead of attempting to derail by arguing your imaginary discussion, consider that what was posted is exactly what was meant, no more, no less. You’ll eventually figure it out.
Nothing is off limits. I simply refuse to play your game of pretending I said something you wish to be angry about.

No, you did not. You wrote in response to what you pretended I posted. You again are only bogged by your choice to pretend I posted something very different than I posted.