grapes
No, just petty theft and indecent exposure
grapes
No, just petty theft and indecent exposure
You’ll have to expand on that so I can provide proper context. Which ones aren’t being farted on?
Most of my favorite women can ejaculate and several of my favorite men have tits. Phrased another way, genderfluid ungendered fluids.
If anyone wanted explicitly sexual words, they have them now. You’re welcome.
Cum all over my tits, make me your alfredo dipped fucknugget
For real, folks need to watch more Jamie Oliver. Condense your pans and ingredient lists, make sauce for a few days, use parchment paper, etc
Depends on what we qualify as an animal and what we qualify as a fart. Would a plant’s waste gas, oxygen, be considered a fart? Sloths experience at least 10 continuous hours of oxygen production. Photosynthetic jellyfish deal with constant, full body internal farting.
Even if we only believe animals can fart, that leaves coral with an order of magnitude more farts, and siphonophores with a dozen orders of magnitude more than that.
I wonder what a bumdaƨƨ is
Someone correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t YouTube still running year over year at a loss?
Feels like a trap. “Yes, please voluntarily offer your personal information to our legal department.”
Wait, was she? I got Eastern European, but not Jewish vibes
During this thread, i started to feel as though sex were, metaphorically, Fahrenheit pretending to be Celsius. It’s still useful in its own way, but an updated lexicon would be helpful as we evolve.
I don’t disagree, it’s just a lament born of exhaustion. As if any subsequent divisions, alternatives, euphemisms, or specifications wouldn’t immediately be surmised as “woke mind virus.”
I admit, I do genuinely love the left wing resolution to the question. “Just give people the freedom to harmlessly be themselves, or else” pretty succinctly cuts through the stochastic terrorism. From the outside, it seems like a complete philosophy with room for future development, edges only apparent when we begin to question what’s human or harmless.
Simply absolving people of the need to care about something is a gloriously tantalizing gesture, and simultaneously collectivizing them through a broader umbrella is powerful. It’s religion for atheists.
I guess it’s fine to accept that there is no single answer to a question, but the absence of concrete definability in a colloquial term is just upsetting on its face. I recognize that there’s no real need for it to be monolithic, but even figuring out how to phrase my question without seeming threatening was a challenge.
In the end, I just want folks to feel safe when I speak to them, and through the answers imparted upon me, I’m inching closer to the level of inclusion that I strive toward. I sincerely appreciate the answer, and if there’s anything that I’ve said here that seems at odds with my stated goal, I apologize.
This is excellent advice that I wish I could immediately incorporate into my being. You’ve described alchemy, as far as my technical but inarticulate ass goes. I hope to be able to do this in person some day.
“biological sex” may be complicated
Absolutely, and the level of hair splitting you can get into is maddening. It almost seems worth discarding the word entirely, in the world’s current state, as it relates to people.
What do you wish to actually know?
The definition of sex, and where it bleeds into gender or doesn’t. I felt like I had a complete understanding of the difference between sex and gender, but there were a few months, a while back, where the terms were used interchangeably and I began to subtly question whether I actually understood them.
Now, several months later, I thought to ask in a relatively neutral space. You guys confirmed that I just happened to see many people misusing words for a bit, which I appreciate.
ArcherAntQuote.png