Stamets@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 6 days agoI mean... I don't see the problem?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square65fedilinkarrow-up1665arrow-down113file-text
arrow-up1652arrow-down1imageI mean... I don't see the problem?lemmy.worldStamets@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 6 days agomessage-square65fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareGoodLuckToFriends@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·6 days agoPffft, Dnd had the ‘first diagonal 5, second diagonal 10’ rule. It worked well enough, aye?
minus-squarebrown567@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up6·6 days agoIt doesn’t anymore =( 5e uses diagonal = 5’
minus-squareVespair@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up4·6 days agoWell anything after 3.5e is a watered-down, bastardized version of the game anyway.
minus-squareedgemaster72@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·6 days agoAlternating diagonals is in the (2014) DMG as an optional rule at least
minus-squarebrown567@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up5·6 days agoOh good! Octagons are a much better approximation of a circle than squares
minus-squareZagorath@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·6 days ago4e just used “squares” instead of 5 feet, but it, like 5e, used chebyshev distances. Pathfinder 2e uses alternating diagonals though.
Pffft, Dnd had the ‘first diagonal 5, second diagonal 10’ rule. It worked well enough, aye?
It doesn’t anymore =(
5e uses diagonal = 5’
Well anything after 3.5e is a watered-down, bastardized version of the game anyway.
Alternating diagonals is in the (2014) DMG as an optional rule at least
Oh good! Octagons are a much better approximation of a circle than squares
4e just used “squares” instead of 5 feet, but it, like 5e, used chebyshev distances.
Pathfinder 2e uses alternating diagonals though.